Md. Private K-12 Schools Get Little State Aid

Share

The rift between public and private education couldn’t be much larger than it is in Maryland, where the public schools are boasted about as number 1 in the nation and the private schools receive less state funding than several neighboring states.

“Looking at other states when it comes to education, Maryland state government provides significantly less to support private education,” said Mary Ellen Russell, executive director of the Maryland Catholic Conference.

(Continue reading in the MarylandReporter.com here)

Proposed Change to Referendum Process Still in House Committee

Share

A bill drafted in reaction to petition drives that put same-sex marriage, immigrant college tuition and congressional redistricting on last November’s ballot is not dead yet, said Del. Jon Cardin, chair of the Election Law Subcommittee that is considering the controversial changes to the referendum and petition process.

With just 13 days left in the 90-day session, Cardin, D-Baltimore County, conceded that “the chances of it moving have decreased.” He said the bill would need numerous amendments to make it palatable to stakeholders.

“No action has been taken,” Cardin said in a phone interview. “We’ve been trying to work with all of the different stakeholders to come up with something that we could all work with.”

The bill, HB 493, has been criticized as an attempt at “voter suppression” for applying stricter standards to the collection of signatures and other aspects of petition drives.

Cardin said there still is a chance the bill could move, and after numerous discussions with all interested parties, he said the legislation would be smaller, less controversial and more bipartisan.

Senate committee waiting on the House

Sen. Joan Carter Conway, D-Baltimore City, chairwoman of the Education, Health and Environmental Affairs Committee and sponsor of the Senate version of the bill, SB673, said the committee was “waiting on the House.”

“That’s a good government bill,” Conway said. “If they don’t send us something, we may send them something.”

The bill has been harshly criticized for its name — The Referendum Integrity Act — and the leader of the Legislative Black Caucus called it an attempt at voter suppression.

In its current form, the legislation opens the door for thousands of referendum petition signatures to be disqualified through numerous administrative guidelines and stipulations. (See previous story.)

Campaign finance disclosure required

The bill also calls for campaign finance entities to be set up for each petitioned bill, requires training for petition circulators and prohibits petition collectors from being paid based on the number of signatures collected.

A tailored version of the bill, according to one stakeholder, would eliminate many of the petition signature disqualifiers and keep the transparency components of the bill.

“Common Cause Maryland believes that transparency in any political spending is critically important, so we do support the bill moving forward that contains the financial reporting element,” said Jennifer Bevan-Dangel, executive director of Common Cause Maryland. “It would [also] be imperative that the amendments eliminate the restrictions on petitioning.”

 

Maryland Government Gets Lower Grade For Spending Transparency

Share

According to a report by the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), Maryland received a C grade for transparency in government spending this year. The grade, which is based on the state’s transparency website, is a half step down from last year’s C+.

The drop in grade is reflective of PIRG’s increasingly tough grading standards, and, according to the report: “in order for states to keep up with rising standards and maintain high scores, they must continually improve transparency.” 

PIRG identifies the best transparency tools as being engaging, easily searchable, and comprehensive. The inaccessibility of Maryland’s website likely led to its less-than-perfect C grade.

“The state of Maryland should improve the breadth and ease-of-access of online government spending information,” said Jenny Levin, State Advocate with Maryland PIRG Foundation, in a statement. “Given our state budget problems, Marylanders need to be able to follow the money.”

States leading Maryland in their transparency efforts include: Texas, Massachusetts, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, and Oklahoma.

“State governments across the country have become more transparent about where public money goes, providing citizens with the information they need to hold elected officials and businesses that receive public funds accountable,” said Levin. “But Maryland still has a long way to go.”

By Becca Heller

Becca@MarylandReporter.com

Original story>

Union Service Fees for all Teachers Would Have to be Negotiated

Share

Service fees for representation by teachers unions in over half of Maryland’s counties would have to be negotiated under a bill that passed the House of Delegates last week and has a Senate hearing Tuesday. The fees would have to be paid by non-union members for  bargaining and other services provided by the unions.

Similar service fees are authorized at the state’s public four-year colleges and universities by bills that have passed in each house. But most university employees, including administrators and faculty, are not currently covered by collective bargaining units.

The service fees known as “fair share’’ are already in effect in 10 of Maryland’s 24 jurisdictions, including the largest counties, and 79% of teachers are already covered, according to Del. Anne Kaiser, D-Montgomery, the floor leader on the bill, HB667.

The fees are generally lower than full union dues, but typically amount to several hundred dollars a year. State employees in collective bargaining units must now pay “fair share’’ service fees.

Republicans oppose mandatory fees

Republicans from counties that do not charge union fees to non-members resisted the measure. “I believe it’s a real mistake,” said Del. Justin Ready, R-Carroll. He offered amendments to make the negotiations optional and exempt teachers who want to negotiate their contracts directly with the school board. Both were defeated.

Ready noted that the 48 co-sponsors on the legislation all came from counties that already had the service fees imposed. (UPDATE: Two Democratic co-sponsors, Del. Galen Clagett of Frederick and Del. Rudy Cane of Wicomico, represent counties that do not currently have union service fees.)

Calling it a “tax on teachers,” Ready said the bill is forcing them to “do something they don’t want to.”

“This bill will erode that local control” that is traditional on the Eastern Shore, said Del. Addie Eckardt, R-Talbot.

Kaiser insisted “this bill is about leveling the playing field” and only “mandates a discussion” of the service fees during contract negotiations. It does not automatically impose the fees.

Several other Republican delegates offered amendments to lessen the impact on teachers who do not belong to a union, but all were defeated on party line votes.

The measure passed the House 95-43, with three Democrats joining 40 Republicans in opposition; two Republicans, Dels. Bob Costa and NicKipke of Anne Arundel, voted for the bill.

Len Lazarick
Len@MarylandReporter.com
Original story>

Bill Requiring Landlords to Accept Section 8 Vouchers Sparks Civil Rights Debate

Share

The bill, SB487, is intended to prevent landlords from rejecting tenants that receive public assistance simply because they are poor. But critics of the legislation said that it would force landlords to participate in social welfare programs and make them do business with housing authorities that send rent checks late and refuse to pay market rates.

Brochin

Sen. Jim Brochin
Photo by Daniel Menefee

Baltimore County Democrat James Brochin said that a landlord from his district was owed over $36,000 in back rent from government housing authorities. He claimed that such stories were legion throughout the state.

Brochin argued that it was unfair to require landlords to keep dealing with officials that do not pay them properly.

‘Mandates Section 8,’ opponent says

“This bill mandates Section 8,” Brochin said.  “If you choose not to work with HUD [the Department of Housing and Urban Development], you’re going to have court action against you. If you start dealing with Section 8 and get tired of it, you won’t have a choice. You’ll have to keep doing it.”

Sen. Jamie Raskin, D-Montgomery, said that Brochin was “unfairly castigating” the legislation. As the lead sponsor of SB 487, Raskin said his sole mission was to stop discrimination and prevent ghettoization.

“I always stand with the underdog,” Raskin said, and he argued that his bill would enable poor people to escape slums and live in safe neighborhoods with good schools.

Raskin accused Brochin of “trying to tear down this civil rights legislation” with false allegations. He read a letter from Anne Arundel County Housing Commission CEO Clifton Martin categorically denying Brochin’s claim that the A&G Management Company was owed thousands of dollars in Section 8 rent.

Raskin

Sen. Jamie Raskin
Photo by Daniel Menefee

“After review by accountants at both the Housing Commission and A & G Management,” Martin wrote, “it is apparent that there is no money owed to the company by the Housing Commission. To the contrary, there is apparent discussion that they may owe the Housing Commission refunds.”

Provisions include no rent increases

This rebuttal did not sway Raskin’s opponents, many of whom said that they were disturbed by the provisions of Section 8 contracts that said that leases could be terminated at any time without notice and that landlords could not increase rents without getting permission from the state.

Sen. Bobby Zirkin, D-Baltimore County, said that those contracts were “unfair,” and that he was particularly concerned by a provision that denies landlords the opportunity to receive government compensation when Section 8 tenants trash their apartments.

Zirkin said that participation in Section 8 ought to be voluntary, and he said that this view was not incompatible with a concern for civil rights.

“I’m not in favor of discriminating against anybody, but I oppose this bill,” he said.

Opposition is bipartisan

Several Democrats said that they would vote against the legislation, including Sen. Nathaniel McFadden, D-Baltimore City.

mcfadden

Sen. Nathaniel McFadden

McFadden reminisced about the moment in his childhood when he and his mother moved out of the housing project. He expressed concern that the legislation would require landlords to prefer tenants who received government subsidies and make it harder for people like his mother to get cheap housing when they are “paying their own way.”

“This bill is not about preventing discrimination,” said Washington County Republican Christopher Shank. “It is about forcing participation in a government program.”

SB 487 faced substantial resistance earlier in the legislative process.  It eked through the Judicial Proceedings Committee in a 6-5 vote, and similar bills have died in committee in 2012 and 2011. The bill was so contentious in the Senate on Tuesday that further debate was set for Wednesday.

The legislation also had enthusiastic champions

Sen. Bill Ferguson, D-Baltimore City, said that his years as a teacher in urban schools made him realize the necessity of SB 487.

Ferguson said that many of his students grew up in ghettos with a heavy “concentration of the generational poor,” and he said that these children needed a way out of poverty.  “Passing this law is a way to ensure that people can have social mobility no matter what zip code they are born in.”

By Ilana Kowarski

Ilana@MarylandReporter.com

Original Story

Senate Finance Committee Kills $3 Hike in Minimum Wage

Share

A bill to raise the minimum wage to $10 an hour died in the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday.  It was defeated in an 8-3 vote with several senators explaining that they opposed the legislation in spite of their sympathy for low-wage workers because the timing was not right for a wage increase.

Finance Chair Thomas “Mac” Middleton  said that he has supported minimum wage hikes in the past but could not justify it in a down economy.  “I think this bill would put people out of work,” said Middleton, D- Charles.

If passed, SB 683 would have gradually increased the minimum wage from $7.25 to $10 over the next three years.  For months, labor organizations and religious organizations have been lobbying for the bill’s passage, and tonight The Raise Maryland coalition will be holding a candlelight vigil as they mourn the death of the minimum wage bill.  Members of the group will march through Annapolis to protest the Senate committee’s rejection of the increase.

Sponsor had tried to save the bill with amendments

Before the committee vote, Del. Aisha Braveboy, D-Prince George’s, who had sponsored the same bill in the House, HB1204, was hopeful, arguing that it was inconceivable for Maryland legislators to increase regressive gas taxes and refuse to raise the minimum wage.

After the vote, Senate Majority Leader Robert Garagiola, the Montgomery County sponsor of the bill, said, “A good foundation was laid for moving this legislation next year.” He noted that there were 24 co-sponsors in the Senate.

To appease opponents of the wage hike, Garagiola had offered several amendments which lowered the amount of the proposed wage increases and postponed their implementation.  He suggested a compromise in which pay increases began six months later than originally proposed, and said that he was willing to stop minimum wage increases once the hourly rate was raised to $9.50.

“The reason for the smaller increase upfront is that we’re still getting out of the doldrums of the recession,” Garagiola said, acknowledging widespread concern that mandatory wage hikes would stifle economic growth.

Middleton asked Garagiola if he had the go-ahead from labor lobbyists to lower the proposed minimum wage, and he replied that they were all willing to accept a smaller wage increase if that was the only way to get a raise.

Only three votes for bill

Despite numerous attempts to garner support for his bill, Garagiola only convinced two of his fellow Finance committee members to vote in its favor, Baltimore City Democrat Catherine Pugh and Prince George’s County Democrat Victor Ramirez.   Eight of the 11 Finance Committee members voted against Garagiola’s bill, even after it was stripped of a provision that would index the minimum wage to the consumer price index.

Though he did not support this change to the bill, Garagiola said that he was willing to accept it if that meant that the bill would pass despite his conviction that minimum wage workers should get automatic wage increases when the cost of living goes up.

“If we believe that there needs to be a floor of wages in this country, then that floor should not be eroded,” Garagiola said, but his words fell on deaf ears.

Increase would result in layoffs, one senator says

Sen. James Mathias Jr, D-Lower Shore, said that his experience as a businessman led him to believe that minimum wage increases would result in layoffs, since businesses are struggling to survive as it is.

“Ordinarily I go for the worker, but I tell you, if there is no place to work, the worker doesn’t get anything out of a wage increase,” he said.  Small businesses were facing brutal economic conditions and were frequently unable to compete with national chains,

Baltimore County Democrat Katherine Klausmeier said that she felt an obligation to serve the interests of her district’s small businesses which are still hurting as a result of the recession.

Fellow Democrat Delores Kelley said that she knew many start-up owners that would have to close their businesses if the minimum wage hike passed.

Republicans made similar arguments.  Senate Minority Leader E.J. Pipkin summed up the view of the committee majority when he said, “If you make things more expensive, you get less of them, and we need more jobs.  This bill ends up hurting the people it is intended to help.”

By Ilana Kowarski

Original Story>

MD Gas Tax Hike on Fast Track For Passage, Would be 5th Highest in US

Share
Republican-news-conference-1024x768

House Republicans hold news conference protesting gas tax, Minority Leader Tony O’Donnell at podium.

Gov. Martin O’Malley’s proposed gasoline tax hike that was late arriving for this year’s General Assembly session is now clearly on a fast track for passage. The House of Delegates gave it preliminary approval Wednesday night — just five days after its first hearing.

The Democrat-dominated House easily beat back Republican attempts to modify the bill, HB1515, indicating more than enough Democrats are on board to pass it as early as Thursday.

The legislation raises an additional $1.6 billion or more in revenues for the Transportation Trust Fund. The bill applies a sales tax rising to 4% over the next three years; and the gas sales tax would rise to 6% if Congress does not pass legislation allowing states to collect an Internet sales tax by 2015.

Quick action in committee

There was a hearing on the bill late Friday afternoon. The House Ways & Means Committee worked on the legislation that night and Monday morning, then passed it Monday afternoon on a 15-4 vote.

Drew Cobbs of the Maryland Petroleum Council had been told that there would be a work group on the bill to include stakeholders, but that never happened.

Republicans made two attempts to change the aspect of the tax hike that they found most galling: It is indexed to inflation and would go up automatically without action by the legislature.

“This is the first time in the history of the state that (a tax) has been indexed to inflation,” said Del. Ron George, R-Anne Arundel, at a news conference.

Automatic increases tied to inflation

McMillan-768x1024

Del. Herb McMillan

“The gas tax will go up and it can never come down,” said Del. Herb McMillan as he offered an amendment to remove that provision. “This gas tax puts us on autopilot and locks us out of the cockpit.”

Maryland is now about in the middle of the states with its 23.5 cent per gallon gasoline tax, but Republicans said the tax hike would make the state’s tax levy the 5th highest in the nation.

“This smacks poor people and the middle class right in the mouth,” McMillan said.

House Majority Leader Kumar Barve, D-Montgomery, pointed out that the income and sales tax are equivalent to indexed since people pay more as income and the price of goods rise.

McMillan’s amendment failed on a 50-84 vote.

No to capping increases, no to stronger lockbox

House Minority Whip Jeannie Haddaway-Riccio of the Eastern Shore sought to cap the increase in the gas tax at 1-cent per year, but that went down on a 50-81 vote.

Del. Susan Krebs, R-Carroll, tried to strengthen the “lockbox” provision of the bill by tying passage of the gas tax to enactment of her proposed constitutional amendment, HB176 that would require a three-fifths vote in both houses to use the transportation revenues for other programs. In the governor’s bill, transfers out of the Transportation Trust Fund require only a three-fifths vote in committee.

“Let’s put the trust back in the trust fund,” Krebs said. She said the constitutional amendment had been proposed nine years in a row without even a vote in committee.

The closest vote came on an attempt by Del. John Olszewski, D-Baltimore County, to put the revenues from marine fuels into the Waterway Improvement Fund, which has been drained as sales taxes on boats have declined and the cost of dredging has risen. The vote was 61-73 against that bill.

‘Shameful and plain wrong’ says one opponent

The galleries were nearly empty during the two-hour House debate, but one representative of gas tax opponents was looking on — Nick Loffer, state director of Americans for Prosperity.

“It’s unbelievable that the House of Delegates supports burdening Maryland’s families and businesses with the 5th highest gas tax rate in the nation,”  Loffer said. “Saddling families with yearly automatic gas tax hikes without a vote by their representatives is just shameful and plain wrong.”

Original Story>

Gas Tax Hike Would Make Maryland Fifth Highest in US

Share

Dozens of people gathered outside the State House Friday to protest a proposed hike on the gas tax. Wielding paper stop signs that said “Stop the Gas Tax,” the group rallied around their spokesman, Nick Loffer, a grassroots director for Americans for Prosperity.

“We’re talking about a 60% gas tax hike which, if enacted, will give us the fifth highest gas tax in the country,” said Loffer. “That’s not okay in Maryland.”

The legislation, HB 1515, raises gas taxes in order to increase revenue for the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF), a joint-fund for statewide transportation needs. The rally was held prior to the bill’s hearing before the House Ways & Means Committee. Opponents bill are strongly critical of Gov. Martin O’Malley’s distribution of transportation money in the past, and feel that this bill enables him to clean up his mistakes at the expense of his constituents.

“The governor has mismanaged the budget for years,” said Loffer. “He’s stolen billions of dollars out of the Transportation Trust Fund. If you put all the money that he took and put towards his pet projects, his priorities and put it towards roads, we wouldn’t be in this situation at all.”

Most of the money transferred from the trust fund has been repaid, except for $1.1 billion taken since 2004 from local Highway User Revenues, which fund municipal and county transportation projects.

Loffer explained that the money in the transportation fund has been unevenly distributed for years. Though almost half of the fund’s revenue comes from the taxes on fuel, the majority of the money has been invested in mass transit and other public services that do not benefit drivers. Only 30% of the capital in the fund was put into roads, Loffer said.

Gas stations, drivers will be hit with increase

The bill would also raise the cost of gas significantly, putting a squeeze on gas stations and drivers across the state. It proposes to gradually raise tax rates on gasoline from 23.5 cents per gallon to 42.7 cents by fiscal 2018.

“The regular person’s gonna hurt,” said Roseanne Biggs, manager of a BP gas station in Clinton, MD. “It’s going to hurt our businesses, too, but we’re going to have to pass it on to the customer and it’s really going to hurt them the most.”

Biggs and others attending the rally said they were concerned about the lack of media coverage the gas tax bill has received due to other controversial bills that are in the legislature right now. According to Biggs, very few of the people she’s spoken to have even heard about the initiative, and some suspect that the timing of the bill was strategic.

“They know when to put it in,” said Dave Barsotti, manager of a Sunoco in Parkville, MD. “They have the death penalty bill, they have other stuff right now — they know when to sneak stuff in.”

By Becca Heller

Original Story>

Becca@MarylandReporter.com

Minimum Wage Hike Would Boost Economy or Destroy Jobs, Friends and Foes Say

Share

An initiative to raise minimum wage to $10 an hour in two years promises to be among the most controversial economic issues debated at the Maryland General Assembly this year.

Sponsored by Sen. Rob Garagiola, D-Montgomery, and Del. Aisha Braveboy, D-Prince George’s, the initiative would reshape the state’s job market for low-income workers.

“This is an anti-poverty bill,” said Garagiola at Thursday’s Senate hearing. “If we raise working families’ wages, we’re going to improve their quality of life, and there will be less reliance on state government.”

Burden falls on business; proponents tout increased consumer spending

Though the government would take credit for raising wages, the financial burden would fall to state businesses.

“It’s not like this money comes from the government,” said Kathy Snyder, president of the Maryland Chamber of Commerce. “The money comes from our businesses. And if [the businesses] don’t have increased sales, where’s the money going to come from?”

Senator Rob Garagiola, Photo by Daniel Menefee

Senator Rob Garagiola, Photo by Daniel Menefee

Proponents for the bill believe that the burden will be balanced out by newly empowered consumers who will be spending more money locally.

“When you increase wages for more than 500,000 Marylanders, we’re putting cash in their pockets,” said Garagiola. “Some studies show that it can help inject nearly half a billion dollars into the Maryland economy.”

Small business vs. large corporations

Many small business owners are not ready to gamble their livelihood on conjectures that consumers will spend their money locally, however. Family-owned grocery stores, especially, would take a hit due to the number of employees that are paid minimum wage.

“Our average annual profit is $70,000,” said Lou Santoni, owner of Santoni’s Catering and Marketplace. “This bill alone will cost us $163,000 a year. And that’s not even including the sick leave bill that’s down the road as well.”

Reports have shown, however, that 70% of all low-wage and minimum-wage employers are large employers including Walmart, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, and other corporations.

“Corporate profits are up and wages are staying stagnant,” said Matthew Hanson, a spokesman for the Raise Maryland campaign. “So it’s not like these large employers can’t afford to pay more, it’s that they are making a choice not to pay more.”

Some argue that the bill abandons the concepts of free market enterprise and competition that have been such essential elements of the U.S. economy.

Competition will set wages

“Free market and competition has driven our industry to where we are in our average hourly wage,” said Rob Santoni, owner of the Santoni Super Market in Baltimore, MD. “To keep the best workers and keep them happy, you will pay what your competition pays. We should not have to be mandated by the state.”

Others feel that it’s simply fixing a problem that doesn’t exist. Bernie Saleanik, owner of All Sports Photo, relays a conversation he had with people seeking employment at his local photography business.

“I tell them I can’t pay you what the union paid you; I can only pay you a certain wage,” Saleanik said. “And you know what they say to me? They say: ‘Are you kidding? If I don’t work at all, I can get subsidized housing, I can get food stamps, I can get life insurance and medical insurance, daycare, you name it. I got about 9 or ten things I can get if I don’t work at all. Why should I work? I don’t need a minimum wage.’”

“That’s what you got going on right now. That’s reality,” said Saleanik.

Low-wage workers appeal to legislators

Several low-wage workers came in to represent themselves and pledge support for the bill. The picture they painted of low-wage work and welfare-living was distinctly different from the cushy life that Saleanik described.

“I live with my daughter and my two grandsons. I help take care of them,” said Lana Stuart, an associate at WalMart who explained that she struggled to raise her family on her $8.80 hourly wage. “My oldest grandson would like to be a doctor someday. And I want to help him to reach his dream. I urge you to vote to raise the minimum wage to help build a better future for people like me to build a better future for our families.“

Many small business owners argue that this bill, rather than helping workers like Stuart, could actually lead to fewer jobs and force businesses to fire employees just to be able to pay the proposed $10 wage.

“Dramatically raising the cost to hire and train entry-level employees will reduce job opportunities in Maryland—it’s simple economics,” said Michael Saltsman, research director for the Employment Policies Institute. “Maryland’s entry-level job seekers need more opportunities, not the empty promises of policies like minimum wage hikes.”

Still, proponents of the bill remain steadfast in their belief that this hike in wages would not only be the fair thing to do for low-income workers, but also act as a stimulant to Maryland’s still struggling economy.

“Raising the minimum wage will help small businesses like my members by putting more money in the pockets of Maryland’s workers, which will boost spending and job creation on Main Street,” said a statement by Margot Dorfman, chief executive officer of the U.S. Women’s Chamber of Commerce, which represents 500,000 business owners nationally and 7,500 members in Maryland. “While some try to portray a minimum wage increase as a fight between business and workers, raising the minimum wage is in reality good for both.”

By Becca Heller
Becca@MarylandReporter.com

Original Story